The 海角换妻 State Capitol Preservation and Restoration Commission heard from the public on Nov. 18 on whether to take down the statue of John Mason from the Capitol building in Hartford.
Chairperson Emil 鈥淏uddy鈥� Altobello led this meeting.
Mason was a colonial-era war figure who led a massacre of Pequot Indians in the 1600s. Critics said the statue should be removed because of Mason鈥檚 involvement in genocide while scholars argued that the statue should remain for educational purposes.
The majority of speakers supported removing the statue, including Shirley 鈥淟aughing Woman鈥� Patrick.
Patrick is the vice chairwoman of the Elders Council of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation, and voiced her support for taking the statue down.
鈥淭he bones of our Ancestors, their blood and bones are all over 海角换妻. You walk upon their bones, you walk upon their blood, they鈥檙e there - during this moment in time, are crying out for something to be done,鈥� Patrick said.
While the majority of speakers supported removing the statue, some wanted it to stay.
One of those voices was from the State Historian Walter Woodward, who said it is important to keep the statue to show different perspectives about the Pequot War.
Another supporter of taking Mason鈥檚 statue down, Manisha Sinha, the James L. and Shirley A. Draper Chair in American History, at the University of 海角换妻, says that statues do not preserve history.
鈥淪tatues commemorate certain aspects, certain people in our history. This should be really made clear, because we, as historians, write books and articles on history. If you want to learn the history of the Pequot War, settler colonialism, or of Indian dispossession, you have numerous books and articles that have been written, at least since the 1960s on Native American history.鈥�
Several Tribal Elders and educators suggested relocating the statue to a museum, where it could be displayed with more educational context.
The Commission will meet on Dec. 14 to make a final decision.
